UPDATE: From the comments, a reader writes:
“There was no mistake at all. How gullible are you, Sassywire? There are 3 other students in the class to back up Sarah – who heard the exact same thing. In fact, the anti-semite professor never denies that he said these words. Regardless of what he claims his intent was, and regardless of his campaign to smear the student and minimize her intellect in order to save himself – these words were said. They are despicable words and should never come out of anyone’s mouth! I am your original source of information – so I’m quite shocked that you so easily cave to the pressure around you. No wonder Jews are always kicked around. When the going gets tough, they immediately bail!”
My Response: Making an accusation of anti-semitism is very serious. Until I know more about this prof and until he issues a more detailed response I will refrain from comment. The truth is, I have no idea if this guy is a Jew hater or just an idiot.
I urge professor Johnston to clarify, but I also urge the students involved to come out with a detailed statement. Specifically, I would like the students to inform us about what happened and what was said by Johnston in class after Sarah G walked out. Vague, anonymous accusations are unacceptable. This is a public blog, not some Facebook chat group. When all involved are willing to come out and tell the whole verifiable story I’ll report the truth and nothing but the truth. Simmer down folks.
——
Professor Johnston has replied to inquiries:
“I discussed that the course focuses on the texts and not “opinions”. In fact, I stated that for this course opinions are not relevant and I questioned the common idea that everyone is entitled to their opinion.
I pointed out that everyone is not entitled to their opinion by giving the example of someone having an anti-semitic opinion which is clearly not acceptable. This was an example of the fact that opinions can be dangerous and that none of us really do believe that all opinions are acceptable.
A good starting point for you in a course based on what we call “critical skills” is to begin by listening carefully to what is said and by responding accurately to this content.
For the record, I am also Jewish.”
Regards,
Cameron Johnston
So either Sarah is quite incompetent when it comes to comprehending the English language, or else she had such an axe to grind with the professor that she didn’t realize that blatant falsehood by her would be detected.
My my – how quickly we believe the anti-semite professor. He is on damage control to save his life. How incompetent are you to comprehending THAT?
So what you’re saying is, we shouldn’t believe the professor when he points out that the allegations of anti-semitism are based on a misunderstanding, because we know he’s an anti-semite? Can you see a problem with your reasoning there?
I don’t know what Sarah was/is thinking. I hope she responds herself.
people need to pay attention in class and these things wouldn’t happen. I feel bad for the prof
There was no mistake at all. How gullible are you, Sassywire? There are 3 other students in the class to back up Sarah – who heard the exact same thing. In fact, the anti-semite professor never denies that he said these words. Regardless of what he claims his intent was, and regardless of his campaign to smear the student and minimize her intellect in order to save himself – these words were said. They are despicable words and should never come out of anyone’s mouth! I am your original source of information – so I’m quite shocked that you so easily cave to the pressure around you. No wonder Jews are always kicked around. When the going gets tough, they immediately bail!
“There are 3 other students in the class to back up Sarah”
Really? Who? Why haven’t any of these students been quoted by any reliable news agency? Ever heard of a little thing called “evidence”? You need to include names or some kind of information for your statement to be valid. Or point to other articles that include this information.
“Regardless of what he claims his intent was…they are despicable words and should never come out of anyone’s mouth.”
You would be extremely hard pressed to find an educated individual who believes that intent does not matter. In truth, intent and context are paramount and need to be considered when attempting to understand any situation or statement. In order to get his point across, he HAD to use something that was offensive and disgusting. He could not have made his point without doing so.
“No wonder Jews are always kicked around. When the going gets tough, they immediately bail!”
That is a bigoted statement. You are a hypocrite. I would never, ever use you as a reliable source. If only other readers recognized this…
I have a better question… Why havent any of the 450 students come up to defend the professor? If the outcome of this case is so obvious, don’t you think there would be an uproar from at least a few of the students? Why should the whole class sit back and not refute the claim that Sarah is making, since they too were witness to this incident.
I think that Sarah left the class in disgust at the initial statement. The professor clearly didn’t feel it necessary to stop her from leaving, and only after, explained his former statement.
It’s the fault of both parties: (1) On Sarah for having left and not listened to everything, (2) And on the prof for having made such a statement on York U campus already riddled with incidents of anti-semitism and conflict between religious groups – he should have known better.
I feel like a student carrying a sign with the statement “All Jews Need to be Sterilized” would gain major attention and warrant repercussions. If that student chanted “This is not true” while carrying the sign it still wouldn’t justify the signs existence.
He never explained his former statement in class. He never said it was an unacceptable opinion the way he claims he did in his email response. In fact, the other girls who stayed in the class after Sarah left were disturbed enough to discuss this with their friends the entire way home and to immediately report this to their parents and families.
Wouldn’t it benefit all parties that the additional girls involved who remained in class let their stories be known. Sarah is taking all the heat and she might not even be the only one with this interpretation of what happened.
To the two com-mentors, and to Pro. Johnston, if the comment was made, then this is the issue. “The sterilization of Jews”, is not the cause for world crisis, Arab over population or Neo Nazi oppression. The problems that plague humanity are due to an age old force called hate and lack of knowledge and acceptance.
If such a statement has been made within the compounds of an open Democracy that has allowed enemies of Democracy to enter her realm, it is time for open minded, free thinking individuals to take back our sovereign nation and protest to deport those unworthy of her protection.
I personally find the immigration process in a conflict of interest situation with Canadian national security. The current system allows the fluctuation of
of new citizens from troubled nations, many of which are connected to radical Islam. The Professor should be brought upon hate crimes, and York University be subject to a racial tribunal by the court system.
Jews are not over populated, Jews don’t commit acts against governments, Jews did not cause 9/11, and furthermore, Jews are so open to there enemies feelings, that they /we have forgotten what we won’t for ourselves.
Leagues and brotherly love with conquered nations has been the story of Israel, from the time of King Josiah until even now, Israel ha always been eagerly ready to sit and make peace with others who have openly hate us.
So what does this tell you?
Daniel Moshe Johnson
I have not heard a word from this prof as of yet!
Hello Mr. Johnston,
I was forwarded some information about anti Jewish statements that you made in your class at York University (“What is an opinion?” Mr. Johnston said. “Well, I have an opinion that people will find offensive. Jews need to be sterilized. That’s my opinion.”) I would like you to call me, so we can talk.
Thank you,
Meir Weinstein
Director Jewish Defence League of Canada
416-736-7000
Why should the prof respond to you Meir? You’re just a buffoon who thinks he’s a big shot. The prof and CIJA talked and that’s sufficient.
What’s your beef with Weinstein, FRS?
Meir is awesome. Enough said.
@Sassy My beef? see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_defence_league and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meir_Weinstein I don’t think we need his kind of thuggery and grandstanding in the Jewish community.
@FRS – There are a lot of outright lies about Weinstein on that Wiki profile. I know this for a fact – particularly in the section about Palestine House. You should meet Meir, talk with him, ask him questions. You’ll see, you have this guy all wrong.
Sassy – there’s nothing anonymous or vague here. The truth is out there – give me your email via FB – and I’ll update you with everything.
Context does not matter when you make a statement in front of a captive audience saying “I think Jews should be sterilized”. I can’t imagine any situation in which this statement would not be offensive. If you did not consider York U a sh*thole before, this should tell you all you need to know.
Katie, I think it’s disgusting that you would say that Jews should be sterilized. I can’t believe the owner of this blog allowed that to be published. You disgust me and you should be ashamed.
Here is one:
“‘All Jews should be sterilized’ would be an example of an unacceptable and dangerous opinion”
Here is one that is acceptable, but is illogical:
“The words ‘Jews should be sterilized’ still came out of his mouth, so regardless of the context I still think that’s pretty serious.”
Correct me if I’m wrong, but those words came out of her mouth. So, by her own words, she’s as guilty of something as the professor.
And his “Also note, I am also Jewish” bullsh*t!!! Come on man! What a scumbag. All those a-holes constantly organizing boycotts, lining up in front of the Israeli consulate on Bloor, sailing “aid” boats to Gaza – ARE ALL JEWISH AND THEY HATE JEWS!!! Cameron Johnston YOU ARE AN IDIOT!
Katie, I will agree with you he’s an idiot, but supporting the palestinians does not make someone a Jew hater.
I agree with you whole-heartedly Katie, but I do think INTENT matters. If this prof is anti-semitic he should be called out on it and fired. If he made the statement because he’s an insensitive dumbass he should be forced to put out a statement apologizing for his ignorance.
People need to realize that hate speech should be vilified and persecuted BUT accusations of such being thrown around CAN DESTROY PEOPLE’S LIVES, guilty or not. Oftentimes, people will hear what they want to hear. This is basic psychology. This sort of practice occurs all the time in the media when a person’s comments, TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT, seem controversial and wrong. According to the professor, the above situation seems to be the case here.
I agree that he is in damage control mode, however there is an easy way to see if his story is legitimate: what I would like to know from people who had attended the class is whether or not the scenario that the professor describes, before the comments were made, occurred. If it did, then the professor is guilty of is assuming the class is paying attention enough to figure out FOR THEMSELVES that he was exemplifying with an extreme example that no one is entitled to an opinion, as an opinion can be based on anything, whether it be logic or hate.
He should chastise himself for picking too extreme of an example, in addition to not clearly describing it as unacceptable afterward. But if I had to guess he was trying to shock the class into paying attention. In my view, this is hardly hate speech. Just a very poor choice of example. Especially if there are anti-Semitic incidents occurring on York campus as some people have described.
In conclusion, I agree that hate speech is unjust but assuming guilt before proving such BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT is also unjust.
If anyone here sees any flaws with my logic I invite you to reply to this post; I wish to know what you think is wrong with what I say.
PS, Mr. Weinstein, the fact is he may be intimidated by you as your title alludes to being the leader of a group whose stated purpose is to ‘protect Jews from antisemitism by whatever means necessary’ and some of the members, former or otherwise, in the United States arm of your organization have links to violence pursuing the above aim.
My head is twirling here with the despicable statement the professor mouthed compiled with the rebuttal. I can only say one thing. If I were a professor who wanted to lecture to a class about opinions.. the statement, “All Jews need to be sterilized” would not even be a thought in my head, never mind openly saying this. To be sure, the professor could have used a million other examples, not this vile repugnant one!
@BH,
I’m not clear what you’re saying exactly, other than Camy is an over-paid idiot and shouldn’t be pilloried until all the facts are in; – such as they are.
But in my book, he’s worse than an idiot. Not because he’s a drama queen but rather as you described, he’s teaching the following:
“he was exemplifying with an extreme example that no one is entitled to an opinion, as an opinion can be based on anything, whether it be logic or hate.”
So fu*king what somebody has an opinion?
[...that's about the stupidest thing anyone can offer by way of instruction, especially coming from someone that's clearly trying to "meducate" the next generation to become flaccid freedom hating citizens.]
Paul, you have no clue. Johnston is trying to teach his students CRITICAL THINKING, something you obviously know nothing about.
Don’t know what to believe until investigations are done and official statements are released…what I do know is that last line “For the record, I am also Jewish” appears to be a lie and cover up…That’s MY opinion.
Mr. Johnston did leave me a voice message.
But you’re not going to post it or you’re not going to retract your original histrionic proclamations? Typical.
In case anyone wants to know what Meir’s all about, this is the original histrionic proclamations to which I referred, from his own website:
“During the past 24 hours, a controversy has erupted over the comments of York University Assistant Professor Cameron Johnston who stated in his class that “Jews need to be sterilized.” York University has evolved into a campus that tolerates anti semitism. It is within this climate that a Professor was able to utter such vile hate.”
THEN, AFTER POSTING LINKS ABOUT ANTI-JEWISH STORIES, HE WRITES:
“The Jewish Defence League of Canada calls on York University to remove Professor Johnston from their campus.”
AND THEN THE IDIOT HAS THE GALL TO POST A REASONABLE MESSAGE TO CAMERON ON THIS SITE. WEIR IS A TWO-FACED SCUMBAG.
Knowing that it is a very sensitive topic on campus – the middle east debates and what not, I find it extremely preposterous having a professor express this kind of opinion, or bring such “example”, as he states.
Is Meir is a terrorist?
Everyone who is taking Grunfeld or Oriyah Barzilay’s side is proving Johnston’s point about opinions: Any idiot (like Meir) can hold an opinion but it does not mean their opinion is valid or should be heard. Stick with FACTS, something that SASSY and many other people on this site seem to know nothing about.
Who decides what opinions are valid and should be heard, RR? You? A student made a public accusation and filed a complaint with York U. I reported that. I then followed up with the prof’s response, the CIJA statement and an Excalibur article on the subject. What the fuck else would you like me to do?
You should have crafted your original blog much better, making sure it was clear that these are UNFOUNDED ALLEGATIONS. Or, you could have contacted Johnston first, to get some CONTEXT. Or are those alien concepts to you? They certainly seem to be to many of the people posting here, who cannot discern opinions and feelings from FACT.
So many people who are posting here seem to belong to the “Don’t say anything that *I* disagree with or don’t want to hear” generation. Please understand that people like you are the very reason more professors need to truly teach CRITICAL THINKING as Johnston tried to do. I hope he does not change anything about his teaching. I know that I will never do so.
Actually RR, I did try to contact the prof, but I’m just a lowly blogger, not mainstream media – got no response. His response was posted within 12 hours of the original post. Are you saying that journalists should not report any story until they know everything there is to know about the story? That’s just not realistic.
This is disingenuous. Your slant was obviously towards his guilt–even in this post you prejudice the professor’s statement with an anonymous accusation, then follow with accusing him of either hating Jews or being an idiot. Either you don’t care to be taken seriously, in which case slander away–we need more drones in the internet mob–or do you wish to be taken seriously, in which case you owe an apology for leaping to an unjust conclusion.
But hey, I get it–saying sorry is a bummer! The student who got this all going clearly feels the same way.
I’m glad you did try, Sassy. As for what journalists do these days, I hope you’re aware that many of them are finally coming under so much fire for doing what you are saying is inevitable. In the old days, there was a thing called fact-checking and integrity. Now it’s all about being the first to post something salacious, regardless of whether it’s true or not. This is not inevitable but it’s where most media are headed because they want to compete with “lowly bloggers.” It’s a sad commentary on mainstream and other media. And the saddest thing is that anyone who posts such things could take an extra two minutes to craft their story in such a way that it truly indicates how much SPECULATION is going on, rather than actual reporting of FACTS. I hope that anyone who posts online can understand this concept.
I disagree that mainstream journalists conduct their work the way they do because they’re trying to compete with bloggers, but that’s another topic. Here’s a hypothetical: If an individual files a complaint with the human rights commission, is it ok to report that, even though we don’t know if the defendant is guilty or innocent? Does media have to wait until the case concludes before they can report on it?
First, it’s pretty common knowledge that mainstream journalists are terrified of being scooped by bloggers and other non- or semi-pros. Second, you can report on the complaint but it has to be presented in a certain way that does not make it seem as if the complaint is valid when absolutely no facts are known–only the complainants accusations. I hope you can see that. Meir Weinstein obviously doesn’t get it…
First of all , a word to Johnston…being a Jew does not preclude you from being an antisemite.
It’s strange that you didn’t think to teach your impressionable students using a statement insulting Islamic people—-I could think of many bad things to say about them and surely you can too. Were you afraid of the backlash?
or about Catholics…or about the Pope…
or about the black student population….just a one word description would have been enough to get you fired.
So you felt that Jews were the perfect example because you could hide behind your own professed Jewishness…..you’re plain chicken, aen’t you.
My one wish for you, Johnston, is for you to quit your job, or be fired, and do teshuva [atonement] in Israel, living on a kibbutz or village bordering Gaza or near Hebron, close to the cave of the Patriarchs, so you can learn to be brave for the right reasons and maybe be inspired by their closeness to use better judgement in the future.
A new Jewish year is beginning soon and it’s a good time for you to have a new beginning too. a new apology…and not a lame one this time…and a move far away.
Were
“It’s strange that you didn’t think to teach your impressionable students using a statement insulting Islamic people”
How do you know he hasn’t, or won’t in future lectures?
“There are 3 other students in the class to back up Sarah”
Really? Who? Why haven’t any of these students been quoted by any reliable news agency? Ever heard of a little thing called “evidence”? You need to include names or some kind of information for your statement to be valid. Or point to other articles that include this information.
“Regardless of what he claims his intent was…they are despicable words and should never come out of anyone’s mouth.”
You would be extremely hard pressed to find an educated individual who believes that intent does not matter. In truth, intent and context are paramount and need to be considered when attempting to understand any situation or statement. In order to get his point across, he HAD to use something that was offensive and disgusting. He could not have made his point without doing so.
“No wonder Jews are always kicked around. When the going gets tough, they immediately bail!”
That is a bigoted statement. You are a hypocrite. I would never, ever use you as a reliable source. If only other readers recognized this…
I was in that lecture when he said those words. Sarah is %100 correct. i even went home and told the incident to my parents, stating how ridiculous it was. To what I recall Professor Johnston said “Opinions are our strongest weapon. Nobody can take away your own opinion from you. Its your right to speak it. *mumbles to himself* Here we go, in my opinion, all Jews should be sterilized. Thats my opinion and nobody can tell me otherwise.” Wording might not be %100 correct but the idea is there. Hope I could help.
Unfortunately, it does not. At the very least, you need to provide your full name so that your statements can be verified and to prove that you really were in the class.
I obviously don’t expect you to tell me your name, nor do I want you to. I am not a journalist, I have no desire to research this. However, why not contact a news agency and make a statement? I have looked at various articles and no one has stepped forward to corroborate with the student who originally made the accusation. Thus, I find it hard to believe that the professor actually said what the student claims he did. I know that, if this had happened in one of my classes, a majority of the class would have become immediately outraged; they would have responded….not remained oddly silent. Furthermore, most schools have a policy about professors giving their opinions in class. Teachers are representatives of the institution that they work for. As such, faculty is drilled repeatedly about what can and cannot be said. For example, at my school, I can’t say in class that I think that homosexuality is a sin/wrong. As such, I find it highly unlikely that any professor would actually make such antisemitic remarks in class….he would be pretty much guaranteed to lose his job. All he would need is for a few students to corroborate.
Basically, before I believe that this event really happened, I need to see hard evidence. I will not condemn a person without it. If only others would require evidence before sending their hateful and uninformed emails, we would all be a lot better off.
Also, if the professor did say that, “Opinions are our strongest weapon. Nobody can take away your own opinion from you,” he is a fool. Psychologists have proven that individual opinion can be changed/shaped/altered through precise forms of propaganda and influence. Hence, a person’s opinion can be taken away from them….just saying.
I was also in that lecture, and Sarah got up and started running around the room yelling the n-word and throwing her feces everywhere. Then she turned into Hitler and flew into the sun.
See, I can do it too.
In truth, I was also in the class. Sarah is actually a green alien from Mars who told me that she came to class to try and start and fight that would end up starting WWIII. When I tried to out her, she did indeed yell the n-word. However, she did not turn into Hitler. She transformed into Mel Gibson before flying into the sun. But it’s easy to see how you got a little confused, what.
Had Johnston insulted other peoples or religions, we would surely have heard about it, don’t u think?
From the news article: “Grunfeld said Tuesday she may have misunderstood the context and intent of Johnston’s remarks, but that fact is insignificant. “The words, ‘Jews should be sterilized’ still came out of his mouth, so regardless of the context I still think that’s pretty serious”.”
Then the words came out of your mouth too, Sarah! If we’re disregarding context here, then YOU’RE an anti-Semite!
LOL!!! Great point ZFT!!!!!
Maybe he had not intention of making an anti-Semitic remark and is really not an anti-Semite. That is something that may be determined conclusively by examining his past actions and statements.
Still, why does he think he should be able to so dramatically make a point while being incredibly offensive and insensitive to Jews?
Do you believe that he would have dared say: ‘All Blacks are _________’?!. Or: ‘All Muslims are ____________’?! Or ‘All women are ___________’?! Never! He would have suffered greatly for uttering such inciteful and provocative statements.
As Professor Cameron is a self-professed Jew, he might therefore take a cue from the Torah. The Torah admonishes scholars to be careful with their words, because others hear and may emulate and cause destruction to the world. Shana Tova, Professor Cameron.
Pingback: College Student Doesn’t Get A Bad Example | Politimo
Pingback: College Student Doesn’t Get A Bad Example | canadian blogs
Pingback: Toronto College Student's Lack Of Cognitive Skills Leads To Anti-Semitism 'Scandal' For Prof
Pingback: College Student Doesn’t Get A Bad Example | eduJunction
Sassy: Just a few pointers about fairness when dealing with accusations tantamount to character assassination. If the initial allegation stands a chance of ruining someone’s life, you pretty much need to refrain from posting until you reach the person in question. If their denials don’t add up, that’s another matter. You have made it clear you at least attempted to reach the prof, but your initial post doesn’t make that clear to readers — which makes me wonder how hard you tried.
It’s not enough to eventually get around to it and follow up with the other side of the story. Or in this case, non-story. You may see yourself as a “lowly blogger” but you are playing with people’s careers here. The student provided the gasoline, you lit the match. And I think you know it.
Hear hear. There’s pretty much no sense of dignity with this doubling down on wild allegations. First from the original young woman, bizarrely claiming that context doesn’t matter in any way as long as the offending words are uttered at all (while, of course, repeating them herself!). Then from Sassy, who jumps to “j’accuse,” then walks it back with, in effect, “I can’t be expected to have the facts beforehand.”
Really, really intellectually dishonest and disappointing all around. And even then, a completely unsubstantiated and anonymous commenter is put *before* the professor’s signed statement, with Sassy tossing in: “I have no idea if this guy is a Jew hater or just an idiot.” Sassy, if this is really the face you want to put forward, you’re really not a good person. We all make mistakes–better just to admit them and try to do better next time. And maybe just chill out a bit and treat others with a modicum of deference and respect (in this case, say, speaking with one’s professor before flying off the rails). Reacting ferociously and without reflection doesn’t make you more right or your argument more effective.
If Ms. Grunfeld misunderstood Johnston’s intent and did not wait to find out what the discussion is about, she is guilty of academic misconduct for such vile accusations and can be expelled. I hope York U investigates her conduct thoroughly. I suspect in such case, Prof Johnston can also bring her and Oriyah Barzilay to court for libel.
That is absurd! you know as well as I that if Johnston had made a similar comment about Catholics or blacks or Islamics, he would have probably been fired within a day…with no inquiry about the context of the statement
If you still haven’t understood the comment Johnston made, you will make a perfect York student! Hurry up and register.
Pingback: tezz.id.au » The Grunfeld Effect
Are these comments for real? Seems the young girl in question isn’t alone in the world, and that’s bad for mankind.
The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs was recently made aware of a lecture given by Professor Cameron Johnston yesterday at York University, which reportedly included an anti-Semitic remark.
In response, Sheldon Goodman, the GTA Co-Chair of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs issued the following statement:
“Upon hearing of this incident, we immediately contacted York University as well as Professor Johnston directly. While York is currently looking into the matter, it appears that a very unfortunate misunderstanding has taken place. We believe Professor Johnston’s use of an abhorrent statement was intended to demonstrate that some opinions are simply not legitimate. This point was, without ill intentions, taken out of context and circulated in the Jewish community.
“Professor Johnston, himself a member of the Jewish community, may regret his wording but should not see his reputation tarnished. This event is an appropriate reminder that great caution must be exercised before concluding a statement or action is anti-Semitic.”
… and did the CIJA find out what Professor Cameron Johnston’s position is on Israel Apartheid Week? – … considering he is the “authoritative” opinion expert at Tehran U (York Campus) on what is acceptable Jew-bait and what is not acceptable Jew-bait.
[let's not forget, B'nai Brith is still backing the student's claim and while the CJIA may represent "organized" Jewry in Canada, they don't represent the vast majority of "disorganized" Canadian Jewry.]
This is why I stick to the sciences… less drama.
First off, to FRS, keep Mr. Weinstein off your tongue, he represents a sane and aware and democratic thinker, something that is lacking among many leaders, who think that siding with the enemy of freedom is the way to go, even when your enemy has sworn in his bible your destruction, and all Muslim in democratic sovereigns who stay silent, believe me, are in quiet solidarity with the Muslim brotherhood, and can’t wait to see many of you rounded up and put to death as the KORAN demands.
To all the Arab sympathizers above, fly your ass into Syria and Gaza and talk your shit then, fly your ass into Israel, and see Arabs living free in the democracy.of Israel, it is as simple as that. Mexicans in LA and the United States legally are not and should not be subjected nor compared to the behaviors and stereotypes of Arabs in non-democratic zones.
So there we have it, the Professor maybe a self haters, or he is so wise that he can draw out the Jew haters in the class by siding with such remarks, in any case, the remarks are not popular, especially on a campus where there is known alliances with the true enemies of democracy, even of Canada.
Daniel Moshe Johnson